Colloquium Series | Philosophy & Religion

Colloquium Series

During this year when the COVID-19 pandemic has limited our ability to connect with colleagues and fellow classmates in person the PHIL speakers committee has organized a bi-monthly department colloquium. Every other Friday from 2-3 we will meet on Zoom to learn about and discuss a faculty member's or grad student's recently finished projects or works in progress. In addition, once a semester we will be hosting a lecture and conversation with an invited scholar from outside the department.

Our hope is that this colloquium might provide an opportunity to get valuable feedback on work at a time when many of us have lost the opportunity to do this through various canceled or postponed conferences, provide virtual space to connect when we are all so physically disparate, be inspired by, and support the work of department grad students, faculty, and invited speakers.

2021 Schedule:

11/5/21 -Protesting everything that beauty is not OR, 'Why is the world so beautiful? (ENV 120 @ 3:00p.m.) Can't attend in person? Join us online via Zoom at https://unt.zoom.us/j/86251636171)

In this text, I offer a characterization of a paradoxical conception of beauty as the condition of the world that we nevertheless need to tend to. As a point of departure, I look at Robin Wall Kimmerer's wonder at the beauty of the world and Édouard Glissant's reflections on Tout-Monde and Mondialité. In particular, I attend to the fundamental character that beauty acquires in Glissant's latter thought. For him, beauty constitutes both the convergence of all world's differences (totality), and a moment/space of aspiration and premonition of this totality that we ought to actualize (in art, for example), and without which the convergence and interconnectedness of the world is threatened. According to Glissant in some of his last works, and in a series of manifestos written at the end of his life with the also Martinican writer Patrick Chamoiseau, at the heart of the contemporary threat to beauty is noise, in its multiple manifestations: racist walls, ministries and offices of immigration, the One, the Identical, an imposed absence of history, the erasure of peoples, languages, cultures, etc. I reconstruct this notion of noise in relation to coloniality, focusing on how we can conceive of a resistance to this imposed uniformity of the world and the fostering of our search of beauty. How do we attune ourselves to the world's connectedness? How to follow the demand to know the world in all its complexity and contradiction?

10/29/21 -Cultivation and Nourishment: A Phenomenological Exploration of Food Space:

We are excited to announce that this will be a hybrid event with both in-person and Zoom options. We have secured ENV 120 for the in-person option. Can't attend in person? Join us online via https://unt.zoom.us/j/83195512484.

This presentation engages in a phenomenological exploration of urban agriculture and food cooperatives to illuminate the freedoms and restrictions granted to and impressed upon bodies through the material and incorporeal construction of food-spaces within industrialized, capitalist societies. We identify these societies as built upon the subordination and objectification of non-normative bodies along racial, class and sexed lines, and seek to identify how this objectification (Fanon, 1952; Young, 1990; Ahmed, 2006) is inscribed not only in the materiality of urban food-spaces but also through the incorporeal social relations that emerge from food and food practices within these physical places. Thus, we will regard "food-space" as the lived and material dimensions of food production, distribution, access, and consumption, and will examine how these spaces emerge to limit or extend bodily possibilities in urban communities. Guided by Merleau-Ponty's description of bodily style, this presentation seeks to probe the limits of his universalized understanding of bodily stylistics (Young, 1990) and pivots to focus on a recognition of and attentiveness to lived differences (Kruks, 2006) as quintessential for co-creating just urban food-spaces. Specifically, we explore community-centric food cooperatives like Detroit's Peoples Food Co-op and grassroots urban agriculture projects like Dallas' Bonton Farms as pathways of just transformation within urban food-space that prioritize cooperation, interconnection, accessibility, co-construction and re-regionalization (Jager, 1999; Merleau-Ponty, 2012). We advocate for a shift in conceptualizations of food-spaces from spaces of production and consumption to places for cultivation and nourishment and posit transformative pathways like cooperatives and urban agriculture as tools for the integration of difference. We ultimately provide a multi-dimensional dissection of food-space that renders visible the lived aspects of cultivation and nourishment as foundational for building equitable communities and, therefore, just societies.

Christina Donaldson is a designer, design researcher, and educator. She holds an MFA in Design from the University of North Texas and an MPSY from the University of Dallas. As an interdisciplinary scholar returning to UNT to pursue a PhD in Art Education, she is drawn to the interplay between design education, psychology, and sociology, and her current work examines resilience, mental health, and community.

Isabelle Bishop is a PhD student and teaching fellow in the Philosophy and Religion department at UNT. She is currently interested in investigating how Western political theory constructed the globalized industrial food system and how bodies and spaces are infected by its perpetuation. She also explores cooperative alternatives to capitalism and the power of food as a revolutionary tool.

4/23/21 -Kevin Siefert

4/09/21 -Keith Maggie Brown "Queer Dé, Weird Daò: Playfulness with the Laozi":

Some queer theory on the art of failure in the Laozi, or Daò Dé Jing, with a nod to Winnie the Pooh and Star Wars too!

3/26/21 -Terence Keel -"Christianity, Race, and the Haunting of Biomedical Science":

Bio: Terence Keel is an associate professor with a split appointment in the Department of African American Studies, and the UCLA Institute for Society and Genetics. He is a critical race theorist, historian of science, and scholar of religion who has written widely about American biomedical science, religion, law, and modern thought. His first book, Divine Variations (Stanford University Press, January 2018) explained how Christian thought made possible the development of the race concept in Euro-American science while also shaping the moral and epistemic commitments embedded in the study of human biology. Keel is an affiliate of the newly formed Center for the Study of Racism, Social Justice & Health at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health. He is also a senior advisor to the Goldin Institute, a Chicago based non-profit organization that advocates globally for grassroots leadership, conflict resolution, poverty alleviation and environmental sustainability.

3/12/21 -Benn Johnson -"Rhizomes and Revolutions":

Given intersecting systems of domination and exploitation discussed by ecofeminists and intersectional feminists, as well as performative theories of agency as proposed by Judith Butler and Karen Barad, what does it mean to do liberatory praxis?

2/12/21 -Adam Briggle -"Aldo Leopold was Wrong":

Get your rotten tomatoes ready! We will dive into ecomodernism and its vision of a Good Anthropocene, which has nothing to do with re-thinking our axioms, slowing down, and getting smaller. Quite the opposite: double down on technoscience to speed up and scale up. What Leopold saw as the root of the problem is actually our salvation: we need to outgrow the land.

1/22/21 -Terra Rowe -"Alternative energies: Gender, Religion and the Displacement Paradox":

Why is it that the more we know about the anthropogenic causes of climate change the more fossil fuels we burn? Several theories suggest answers, but don't address the distinctiveness of US hyper-energy consumption. Schwerin Rowe will here propose a unique approach to this conundrum and to the study of energy cultures, employing affect theory as a way of analyzing how gender and religious beliefs and values have and continue to infuse distinctively US American energy dreams and desires. In the end, unless we critically address these aims and values, any new "alternative energy" will, as history has shown, merely result in energy additions.

2020 Schedule:

12/04/20 -David Kaplan - "Hunger Hermeneutics"

11/20/20 -Johnathan Flowers -"Mono no Aware an Aesthetics of Experience: Gender, Nature, and Culture":

Dr. Flowers is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy at Worcester State University. His research focuses on the affective ground of experience and embodiment through American Pragmatism, Phenomenology and East-Asian Philosophy. He also focuses on Pragmatist and cross-cultural approaches to machine intelligence, consciousness, and science and technology studies broadly.

11/6/20 -Jeff Gessas -"Settler Colonialism and Environmental Philosophy"

10/23/2020 -Dr. Samantha Langsdale -"Good, Bad and Technology: Analyzing the Philosophical Problems of Marvel Comics' Ironheart"

https://philosophy.unt.edu/sites/philosophy.unt.edu/files/philosophy/Comics_Sacred_Texts-54.jpg

Abstract:

Taking to Twitter to discuss her work on the Marvel comic Ironheart, writer Eve Ewing teased that she had snuck her "ongoing rants about the banality of evil" into the book. And indeed, Ironheart #1-12 by Ewing, Vecchio, Libranda, and Milla, features RiRi Williams' struggle to understand whether her ambition, intelligence, past trauma, and paternal heritage predispose her to evil. Through her collaborations with friends like Nadia Van Dyne as The Wasp, RiRi learns the Arendtian lesson that any unthinking person has the capacity for evil--it is not one's "nature" that causes evil, but one's choices. And while this philosophical problem is compelling, particularly as part of the superhero genre wherein categories of good and bad are frequently muddied, this paper argues that equally pressing philosophical problems are posed by the creation and use of technology throughout the book. While RiRi herself seems relatively unbothered by the implications of advanced technology, several supporting characters throughout the twelve issues voice concerns about, for example, surveillance and lack of privacy. Further, we are shown how RiRi's engineering ambitions are both hindered (by academic bureaucracy at MIT) and buoyed (she sells a patent for tracking technology) by capitalism. Thus, by putting Ironheart into conversation with the works of Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault, this paper will analyze the ways Eve Ewing explores the moral ambiguity of technology alongside RiRi's own development as a hero committed to doing good. This paper also examines the role of physical violence within the comic in order to ask whether and how it might be considered an example of what Martha McCaughey called "physical feminism," or, if the use of violence by an otherwise feminist character constitutes further (futile) attempts to "dismantle the master's house with the master's tools" (Lorde). Ultimately, while RiRi learns that there is nothing inevitable about being good or evil, her creation and use of advanced technology contributes to a certain level of moral ambiguity throughout the book.

Background Info

PowerPoint

Thinking about UNT?

It's easy to apply online. Join us and discover why we're the choice of over 42,000 students.

Apply now